One in Israel

Part of Israel's charter states that every Jew has the right to be at home there. Fleeing from the horrors of hatred, passport control Ben Gurion airport has never turned a Jew back. Hundreds of thousands have arrived to the holy land with a little less than the clothes on their back.

The Law of Return, LOR, provides a home to any Jewish person. But the law recognizes that an oleh is not merely someone who is made the decision to settle in Israel, it is someone who is returning home.

The connection between the diaspora an the land is akin to that of a parent and an estranged child. The offspring has moved away. Once in a while he sends a card. One day, hopes the parent, I will make a decision to return home. And when he does come with the family will be whole again.

There have been attempts made by Orthodox groups to amend the LOR to include a caveat that the person coming to Israel be born to a Jewish mother or converted according to Jewish law, halacha. The argument of amending the LOR is generated much heat over the past decades especially since the word halacha is not trade-marked yet often seems to be possessed by the right wing.   Those who try to amend it want to invalidate Reform and Conservative conversions.

That Israel is a Jewish state is not debatable and non-negotiable. But imagine that Israel becomes a de jure Orthodox state. That would disenfranchise anyone non-orthodox.  That would be a catastrophe.

I am buoyed by the fact that Israel has been in existence now for 70 years and a careful balance has been maintained to ensure that every Jewish person has a place in the Jewish homeland.   Proof that we are one people..

Factionalism in Israel

Israel's charter states that every Jew has the right to return home. Fleeing from horrors of hatred, the passport control at Ben Gurion airport turns no Jew away . Hundreds, thousands and tens of thousands have arrived in the holy land with little else but the clothes on their back.

Simply stated, the Law of Return stipulates and provides a home for any and every Jew. But the law recognizes that an “oleh” is not merely someone who has made a decision to settle in Israel, it has a higher value for it is about someone  returning home.  After centuries of wandering, several restricted or expelled at the whim of warlords and kings there was finally a resting place established in 1948 where all Jews could find a place from which they could never be thrown out.

The historic connection between the diaspora and the Land is like that of a parent and an estranged child.  The offspring has moved away.  They have long forgotten their roots.  Yet, once in while they have a pang of conscience and send a card.  The parent hopes that one day the child will make the long journey home.  Those days of yearning are over.  The family of Israel can be whole once more.  

For many years Orthodox groups have been trying to amend the Law of Return to include on people whose identity can be proven (it used to be just a person’s word that they were Jewish was enough) or converted according by an Orthodox rabbi.  Needless to say this amendment would exclude all non-Orthodox conversions in addition to calling into question marriages as well as many Orthodox (as the latter vie for control) conversions and marriages.

The pivotal question that lies at the heart of broad acceptance of evert professing Jews is the validity of rabbinic authority outside the sphere of the political machinations of Israeli religious politics.  Imagine if Israel became a de jure religious state under the thumb of Orthodoxy.  As Jews, we are inextricably connected with the land. While the Orthodox community would largely embrace such a change in the Law of Return, Conservative and Reform communities would recoil in horror and begin to feel distance from Israel.  It is a real danger is when the non-Orthodox community begins to feel threatened and withdraw not only their support from Israel but develop an antagonistic attitude toward Orthodoxy, out brothers and sisters.

Presently, we are held together in a precarious balance; each side vying for domination. The consensus uniting Israel is fragile.

Many times in our history our people have been divided over the interpretation of law. One example with which we are all familiar is when the Maccabees brought about an end to Greek rule. The Maccabean rebellion was essentially against the Greeks and the Jews who sided with the Greek overlords.  It was a terrible war. Another time was when Jews split which during the revolt against Rome a few centuries later.    This time the rift produced Christianity.  At first they called themselves Jews and were accepted as such until the gulf between them became bridgeable.

In the diaspora, our differences are kept in check, as no one group has power over another. In the Jewish land, the sword of Damocles hangs over our heads as it did long ago with the Pharisees and the Sadducees and, before them, with the Maccabees and the Hellenizers.  Sinat hinam, baseless antagonism, enmity between Jew and Jew, brought about the destruction of the Second Temple.  Could such hatred bring about more destruction?